In this lesson, we’ll study the differences between “compared to” and “compared with.” While these phrases are often used interchangeably, they have distinct connotations that can enhance the precision of your writing.
Compared to:
Definition:
“Compared to” is used to liken one thing to another, highlighting similarities between them. It is often employed in metaphorical or figurative contexts.
Example:
“The author and entertainer compared his world to a stage, suggesting that life is like a theatrical performance.”
Compared with:
Definition:
“Compared with” is used to examine the differences and similarities between two or more items, focusing on an analytical comparison. It is more neutral and objective than “compared to.”
Example:
“Compared with 1996, the 2000 election was problematic, indicating that there were notable differences in the challenges and controversies of each election year.”
Comparison:
- Compared to:
- Used for likening or showing resemblance.
- Example: “She compared his gentle nature to that of a lamb.”
- Compared with:
- Used for examining both similarities and differences, often with an emphasis on differences.
- Example: “Compared with last year, this year’s sales have increased by 20%.”
Understanding when to use “compared to” versus “compared with” can refine your writing and make your comparisons clearer. Use “compared to” when you want to liken one thing to another, emphasizing similarities in a figurative or metaphorical sense. Use “compared with” when you are analyzing items to highlight both their differences and similarities in a more objective manner. By choosing the appropriate phrase, you can convey your intended meaning with greater precision and clarity.
