In this lesson, we’ll discover the meanings and distinctions between the confused terms: “Arraignment” and “Indictment.” Although both terms are related to legal proceedings, they represent different stages in the criminal justice system. Knowing these differences is crucial for clarity in legal contexts.
Word 1: Arraignment
Definition:
“Arraignment” is the formal procedure in court where a defendant is called upon to answer the charges against them. It typically involves the reading of the charges, informing the defendant of their rights, and allowing them to enter a plea.
Examples of Use:
“The judge postponed the arraignment for a week to allow the defendant’s attorney more time to prepare.”
“The defendant entered a plea of not guilty during his arraignment.”
“Arraignment is a critical stage in the legal process where defendants are formally informed of the charges against them.”
Word 2: Indictment
Definition:
“Indictment” is a formal accusation or charge against a defendant for a crime, issued by a grand jury or a prosecutor. It indicates that there is enough evidence to proceed with a criminal trial.
Examples of Use:
“The grand jury handed up an indictment against five people suspected of drug trafficking.”
“The prosecutor filed an indictment against the suspect for multiple counts of fraud.”
“An indictment is a serious legal document that initiates criminal proceedings against a defendant.”
To summarize, “Arraignment” is the formal calling of a defendant to answer charges in court, while “Indictment” is the formal charging of a defendant with a crime, typically issued by a grand jury or prosecutor. Understanding the distinction between these terms is essential for navigating the legal process and ensuring clarity in legal communication.
